HomeBlogTrail Camera Noise: Part 1 — Clicks

Comments

Trail Camera Noise: Part 1 — Clicks — 20 Comments

  1. This is great, I often wondered what exactly the animals were hearing from the camera. The video and audio of the filter moving is great! I’m sure knowing to consider a camera with separate sensors for daylight and darkness will probably help people out if they know they’re pursuing something particularly sensitive to the sound

    • Thanks for feedback! The two image-sensor solution is definitely a quieter way to do visible and IR photography. There are a set of “4-color” sensors available now that sense Red, Green, and Blue as well as (near) IR on separate channels. These sensors could be used in trail cameras to eliminate the IR filter without the cost of another separate sensor (and optics). I’m not aware of any cameras that do this, though.

  2. II have moved to all duel sensor cameras finding that the IR filters have a high failure rate causing either off color daylight photos that cannot be corrected or black night photos.

    • Sorry to hear about IR filter failures. If you are interested in fixing, see recent post on “How (Some) Trail Cameras Fail”. The fix could be as easy as reflowing the solder on the wires to the IR filter. If you try, I’d be interested to know how you make out.

  3. Pingback:Trail Camera Noise: Part 2 - Ultrasonic Squeals - Winterberry Wildlife

    • If you remove the IR filter completely, your camera will take night time photos/videos “correctly”, however daytime photos/videos will be pink (as in the cover photo for this post). On the other hand, if you cut one (or both) of the wires to the IR filter motor, and leave the IR filter engaged, the camera will take daytime photos/videos correctly, but night time photos and videos will be very dim (If the IR filter isn’t in the right state (i.e. if it’s disengaged) you can use a pin to “click” it into the engaged position).

      If you are into the camera to do either of these minor surgeries, you should consider first trying to “reflow” the solder on the two leads connecting the IR filter motor to the PCB. This requires a soldering iron, and a little patience. For me, it also requires a pair of strong reading glasses so that I can see the point at which the solder on the pad melts completely.

  4. Pingback:Inside the Bushnell Core DS 4K Trail Camera - Winterberry Wildlife

  5. Pingback:Browning Spec Ops Elite HP5 Teardown - Winterberry Wildlife

    • Well, not technically. I’ve never cut the wires. However, you are probably asking two questions: 1) do you have any daylight pictures where the IR filter is (erroneously) disengaged (out of the optical path); and/or 2) do you have any night time pictures where the IR filter is (erroneously) engaged?

      On one, yes. We have photos from early Lift2’s in which the IR filter became unreliable, with the result that it was always engaged. Night time photos were fine, but daytime photos were red-tinged, as in a pink panther featured as the cover shot of How (some) Trail Cameras Fail

      One two, not really. But if we did, they would look like this: in the dead of night, they would be very, very dim and black and white, since the IR filter is blocking out the IR flash (the only light available). In twilight, the image might be brighter (from available sunlight), but would still be black and white, as the camera is processing the image as a black-and-white image based on the low light.

      I also helped someone fix a camera in which the motor wires were reversed — so all of his daytime photos were pink, and all of his night time photos were black 🙁

      When I converted a Browning Recon Force Advantage over to white flash, as in IR to White Flash Trail Camera Conversion, I did some experiments where I either engaged or disengaged the IR filter during white-flash-illuminated night photos (this was after I hacked the firmware so it processed these images in color, vs. black and white). I thought the color balance with the IR filter engaged (same as daytime sunlit shots) was a little better than without.

      Let me know if I missed your (underlying) question.

      • I was wondering just how bad the night time pics were if the filter was still in place. If you could still make things out it might be worth getting rid of the click. I have a tactacam sk that has spooked several deer.
        Thanks

        • Oops — my bad — I forgot to look at the name of the post you commented on.

          It’s definitely the case that the IR filter motor “click” spooks some animals.

          Unfortunately, the IR filter effectively blocks almost all of the IR LED light, so I think the night photos/videos would be unusable.

          There are cameras that solve this problem with two image sensors — one with an IR filter, and one without. They use IR filter sensor for daylight photos/videos and the one without at night. Browning makes one, as does Bushnell and Reconyx.

          I’ve contemplated a firmware fix which would work like this: the firmware would figure out when dawn and dusk happen (I think many cameras already do this to make sure that timelapse mode is only active during daylight hours). At dawn and dusk every day, the firmware would wake the camera up and switch the IR filter to the right position in anticipation of a possible trigger later that day/night. This would still cause a click, but would almost certainly happen when there was no animal to hear it. When it was time to take a photo/video, the IR filter would already be in the right state, so no click. Waking the camera up twice a day to make the switch would consume a little more power, but not significantly more. I’ll add this “Smart IR Filter Motor” mode to my list of potential firmware hacks.

          -bob

          • Yes that firmware would be a lot better. I was aware of the dual lens cams. I have went to all cell cams and looked the web far and wide for a cell cam with dual lens,trailcampro said no one makes one and hadn’t heard of anyone coming out with one. I luckily found one just after asking you about cutting the wires to the filter. I have one on order and hope it solves the problem. Sounds to good to be true really, dual lens,no flash,.4 second trigger,sends bigger pics, good data plans and reasonably priced

          • Ahh — I see. The requirement for cellular connectivity does add a wrinkle. Good luck with the model you found. If it works well for you, would be interested in hearing more.

  6. Browning has a firmware update to fix the clicking noise at the beginning of videos. Does anybody know how they do it? I wonder if the firmware fix is as Bob Zak describes above or does it chop off the first half second of every video? I make You Tube wildlife videos and the clicking is annoying and time consuming to remove but I also do not want to lose a half second of every video clip.

    • I’m not sure that the “clicking” noise (sometimes) caused by the IR filter motor, and the “clicking” at the start of videos are the same. More likely, the apparent clicking that the Browning firmware fixes is an electronic artifact caused by not setting up the audio processing pipeline early enough. In all the firmware I’ve looked at, the IR filter motor is done moving when the video starts (actuation of the IR filter is done in parallel with the setup of the image sensors). I would go ahead and use this new firmware. If you have two cameras, you can upgrade one, and see if it triggers any differently than one you don’t upgrade in a controlled experiment where both cameras cover the same event.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Shares